JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 18, 2023

A- de 2023

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar

✓Claimant Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Manifestación de impedimento formulada por el conjuez Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez.

El profesional consideró que está impedido para pronunciarse sobre el asunto objeto de revisión, por estar incurso en las causales previstas en los numerales 1 y 4 del artículo 56 del Código de Procedimiento Penal.

Esto, por ser el apoderado de una AFP y haber intervenido, precisamente, en el proceso de tutela de la referencia.

Al encontrar acreditado que la imparcialidad del conjuez se ha comprometido y que en su caso particular presenta un interés actual, especial y personal sobre la resolución del caso, la Sala Plena de la Corporación ACEPTÓ el impedimento propuesto por el doctor Guerrero Pérez.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. PRIMERO. Aceptar el impedimento manifestado por el Conjuez Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez, para participar de la decisión que se profiera en el marco del expediente T-7.867.632 AC.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.